“Я сам много лет пользуюсь исключительно продукцией XLO и Argentum и абсолютно не нашёл приемлемой альтернативы этим кабелям. В случае необходимости могу заказать для Вас оригинальные продукты от XLO (некоторые модели серии Reference), Ultralink (все модели), Argentum Acoustics (все модели), Cardas (линейки Cross и Legacy), Acoustics Zen и других производителей.”
[quote=“OlegSA, post:104, topic:1799, full:true”]
Двух Владов одна реальность может не потянуть…
[/quote] Это зависит от клона:grinning: Профи он или мимо проходил…
А 8 футовый обойдется всего в 50 т.р. а не 1300 уе))
Хотя довольно таки странно, дело в том, что кабели уже официально давно не поставляются, в боксах - тем более, те что есть у производителя - это остатки от бухт и разъемов, которые они доделывают и распродают… ну и со склада еще там есть кое что по XLO …
То есть то что еще продается легально - поставляется без боксов, и это однозначно…
Напишите на сайт Аргентум - и получите ответ…
скажем примерно такого содержания… из переписки…
I was talking to XLO today.
Originally he was just having me sell-off left-over stock of the Argentum cables, and we were going to go until he ran-out. However, now he makes the same cable for some other cable companies that brand it with their own name and connectors. (and no, I cannot tell you who they are! but I can tell you that their prices are much higher!!)
What we’re going to do now is just sell the Argentum cables until he runs out of the Argentum hardware (connectors, labels, outside sheathing, etc.) and we’re going to stop.
Так что откуда взялись кабели с боксами - я лично не знаю… Так как Аргентум - это Канада (США), а там о боксах ни слуху ни духу…
ну вот еще за кабели XLO говорим.
The head office of XLO in Toronto is having the cable brought up to Canada from the XLO factory in the US and they are terminating it here at custom lengths for me. However they have added the hologram/serial number card to prove its authenticity - the original Reference 2 cables never came with a hologram/serial number sticker since the counterfeiters were not copying that cable.
Я тут спросил за конструкцию у межблочников… ну там типа сколько моножил какого сечения…
ну и вот…
"Hi Vlad,
For the RCA (unbalanced) analog interconnect, our design is of course unique in a number of ways. Virtually all other designs are a coaxial type - in other words, for the necessary two conductor poles, they employ a center conductor pole for the signal send (to the RCA center contact) within a surrounding shield for the signal return (to the RCA outer ring contact). There are factors that render this concept less than optimal. First the two poles are very different in material, configuration and type, having quite different electrical characteristics and behaviors. The next harm is they send the signal (return) through the very shield, which is capturing electrical noise (electromagnetic interference and radio frequency interference) - it is easy to see how this is mixing the electrical noise with the music signal, polluting the music. Conversely, for our design, we employ two precisely identical conductor poles, with precisely identical material, configuration, type, and electrical characteristics and behaviors. Additionally, these two conductors are housed and embedded within the Faraday Cage of our shielding systems - the signal is not routed through the “noisy” shield. The captured electrical noise of the shieldings are drained directionally only on the source end of the cable, taken harmlessly “away” from the music, hence the captured noise is not transferred along to the next component in the music system.
For the RCA (unbalanced) analog interconnect, our design is of course unique in a number of ways. Virtually all other designs are a coaxial type - in other words, for the necessary two conductor poles, they employ a center conductor pole for the signal send (to the RCA center contact) within a surrounding shield for the signal return (to the RCA outer ring contact). There are factors that render this concept less than optimal. First the two poles are very different in material, configuration and type, having quite different electrical characteristics and behaviors. The next harm is they send the signal (return) through the very shield, which is capturing electrical noise (electromagnetic interference and radio frequency interference) - it is easy to see how this is mixing the electrical noise with the music signal, polluting the music. Conversely, for our design, we employ two precisely identical conductor poles, with precisely identical material, configuration, type, and electrical characteristics and behaviors. Additionally, these two conductors are housed and embedded within the Faraday Cage of our shielding systems - the signal is not routed through the “noisy” shield. The captured electrical noise of the shieldings are drained directionally only on the source end of the cable, taken harmlessly “away” from the music, hence the captured noise is not transferred along to the next component in the music system.
Cheers,
Brad"
[/quote] Что мешает поставить второй экран в коксе…Вот и нет помех на первый экран и + еще надежней защищён…
Ага и кучу имен из США назвал ))) Либо он в штаны наложил (ибо мошенник), либо понял что это Влад…Он ж мог звонить вам, как покупатель и запомнил голос )))
but I can tell you that their prices are much higher!!)